Saint Mary's Christian University
About
About the University Mission and Values Leadership and Faculty The Digital Campus Compare Us With In-Person Learning Accreditation and Status
Programs
Programs of Study Undergraduate Degree TESOL Certificate Curriculum and Modules
Study
Study Formats Assessment The Platform Research and Evidence Accessibility Neurodivergent Students
Admissions
How to Apply How It Works Tuition and Financial Aid Credit Transfer International Applicants
Student Life
Student Life Careers and Outcomes Common Questions Contact
Home/About/Leadership and Faculty

Leadership and Faculty

Faculty design the curriculum, set the assessment criteria and supervise the teaching. The platform carries their decisions to every student.

The working arrangement

What Faculty Do, and What the Platform Does

Faculty write the curriculum, select and sequence the material, set the standard against which work is marked, and calibrate how the platform responds to students. Every checkpoint question a student encounters has been reviewed by the faculty member responsible for that module.

The platform carries out the work that has always limited what one teacher can do for thirty students at once: answering the same question as often as it is asked, confirming comprehension before a student proceeds, monitoring progress continuously, and being available at whatever hour a student is able to study.

The division is deliberate. Judgment, standards and pastoral responsibility remain with faculty. Availability and repetition are delegated to a system that does not tire of either.

University leadership

Our Leadership Team

Dr Sarah Chen

Vice President, Academic Affairs

Dr Chen is responsible for academic programs and curriculum development. She holds an Ed.D. in Curriculum and Instruction from Columbia University and has published on integrated pedagogy. She sets the academic standards to which all programs are held.

Rev. Michael Okafor

Dean of Students

Rev. Okafor leads student services and pastoral support. He holds an M.A. in Counseling from Fuller Theological Seminary and works principally with students balancing study against employment, family and distance.

Prof. Paul Whitaker

Professor of Applied Linguistics

Prof. Whitaker holds a PhD in Applied Linguistics and the Cambridge DELTA. He taught English for eighteen years across Southeast Asia and Latin America before moving into teacher training. He oversees the TESOL Certificate and the language and methodology modules of the degree.

Intellectual foundations

The Scholarship Our Curriculum Rests On

The University's teaching model is drawn from established research. These are the scholars whose findings shape how our programs are designed.

Benjamin Bloom

Mastery learning · University of Chicago

Principal investigator of the 2-Sigma study, which quantified the advantage of individual tuition over group instruction, and author of the taxonomy of educational objectives adopted in more than a hundred countries.

Paul Black and Dylan Wiliam

Formative assessment · King's College London

Authors of Inside the Black Box. Their review of more than 250 studies established the case for assessment conducted during learning rather than only at its conclusion.

Lev Vygotsky

Developmental psychology · Moscow State University

Originator of the zone of proximal development and of sociocultural theory. His account of scaffolded instruction underpins how our lessons sequence difficulty.

Jean Piaget

Cognitive development · University of Geneva

Founder of the International Center for Genetic Epistemology. His four-stage model of cognitive development remains standard in teacher education worldwide.

Paulo Freire

Critical pedagogy · University of Recife

Author of Pedagogy of the Oppressed and originator of the dialogical method, which informs our emphasis on learner agency and assessment by discussion.

John Hattie

Evidence-based education · University of Melbourne

Author of Visible Learning, the largest synthesis of educational research undertaken. His effect-size rankings inform which interventions the University adopts.

Oversight

How Teaching Is Supervised

The platform is supervised by faculty from end to end. Faculty write the material it teaches from, define the criteria by which comprehension is judged, and review the checkpoint questions before they reach students.

The arrangement produces a record that faculty use. Patterns in student responses show where a lesson is not landing, which points are repeatedly misunderstood, and where material needs rewriting. Each cohort improves the teaching received by the next.

Curriculum
Written and sequenced by faculty, who hold responsibility for content and standard.
Assessment criteria
Defined by faculty and applied identically across all eight assessment methods.
Checkpoint review
Comprehension questions are reviewed for accuracy before being issued to students.